By Not Normalising Ties With Israel, Arab Leaders Serve Their Foes' Interests


With all due respect to Arab Leaders: just drop the act. Those who follow the Middle East closely know the usual Arab Platitudes and, quite frankly, it is getting old. There's one interesting development however: the Arab League blacklisted Hezbollah as a terrorist group...with a twist.

The Middle East Could be a Power House

Arab leaders are pitiful in a sense that they allow external forces to put them down (i.e. to keep them divided, underdeveloped and as a military test lab) at the expense of the people, instead of uniting not for war but for the construction of a better future. They prove that the enemy of the Muslim people, in the ME, are not the Americans nor the Europeans but their own leaders – on whom the responsibility for the human development of their respective nations lies upon.

PM Bibi Netanyahu has already invited Arab nations to unite with Israel since the possibilities of doing so are endless. But in order for those possibilities to unfold Arab States need to purge themselves of the usual platitudes; but even if they drop them now, it will take time to create change because Arab leaders have taught the Arab people to hate Israel – a word that has evolved into being a synecdoche of Jews - ever since Abdel al-Nasser advocated for Pan-Arabism (which instead of solely focusing on the greatness of the Arab union, it morphed into a Jew-Hatred Project). This is why the increasing Arab voices calling for the normalisation of ties with Israel seem to be falling in deaf ears (moreover, is the West truly interested in seeing such a normalisation taking place? The obsolete way of doing politics dictates they win more by keeping the region in constant conflict).

Dropping the Act

Whenever an Arab leader, a pundit or a commenter says something right, immediately he or she will say something stupid – pardon the directness of my language. For instance:

  • When the Dubai Security Chief stated that the time had come for the Arabs to normalise ties with Israel, that the Two-State solution wasn't viable at the moment (a fact most are starting to see but refuse to admit in public), that Arabs in Palestine should live under Israeli law; he immediately said the stupidest thing a person can say: one day Arabs/Muslims will outnumber the Jews and Israel will become a Muslim Arab State. 
  • When an Egyptian TV commentator was criticising Hamas' lack of strategy regarding Israel (i.e. attacking a much stronger country that hardly suffers casualties in comparison to Hamas) and the senseless animosity towards the Jewish People; he immediately cursed Israel and stated that he wanted the Israelis to burn in hell (by Israelis did he mean the Jews only or all Israeli citizens?). 
  • When the Arab League-affiliated Arab Parliament designated Hezbollah as a Terrorist Organisation, it explained the decision “Hezbollah's practices (...) are aimed at undermining the security of many countries in the region” and Ahmed al-Jarwan had to say the most stupid thing a person could think of “I hope Hezbollah points its weapons at Israel”.

Nasser's Jew-hatred is so deeply entrenched in the Arab tissue that even though they know what the right thing to do is, they find it very difficult to get rid of the evil genie that sits on their shoulder; and so the result is nonsensical behaviour and speech. It's getting old and tiresome.

How many Arab nations do business with Israel? Most of them, albeit in a very veiled fashion. This is sheer hypocrisy and the time has come to unshackle themselves from petty and counter-productive feelings; because let's get real, folks: who gets to lose more from all this nonsense? Not Israel, that's for sure. So, now Arab nations have a choice: either they get a grip and normalise the relations with Israel or they don't and remain the West's desert pets.

Conclusion

Israel is here and it's not going anywhere. Accusing the Jewish State of this and that, using the international community to undermine it, putting Israelis (of Arab ascendency) in an ungrateful and treacherous position, will not change the reality on the ground; so a lot of time and opportunity is being wasted. The time has come for Arab Nations to keep up with the times. Seize the moment. It's not enough to build modern buildings to attract  western tourists and investors; Arabs really need to change their stance, their speech and make themselves more credible because when their lips say something but their actions speak otherwise, they show us they are not reliable partners for change in the Middle East. And if they are not: what will become of that beautiful region?
Using Islam as a basis for preventing Arabs from recognizing any sovereign right of Jews over the Land of Israel is new. Such beliefs are not found in classical Islamic sources. Concluding that anti-Zionism is the logical outgrowth of Islamic faith is wrong. This conclusion represents the false transformation of Islam from a religion into a secularized ideology. - Sheikh Abdul Hadi Palazzi
"(..) false transformation of Islam from a religion into a secularized ideology"...How Ironic, n'est-ce pas?

(Image: The Gulf of Aqaba - Jean-Léon Gérôme)

[The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Dissecting Society]

Comments

  1. A Saudi official just said that if Israel adopts the Arab peace initiative, Saudis would open an embassy in Israel, but adopting the initiative would be suicidal so their sign of good will is meaningless and a way of saying "see we tried to normalise ties but they didn't want to". Things will never change or at least not for now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Anonymous :D!

      Yes, I read that too and I left a comment on SM: if Saudi Arabia adjusts the Arab Peace Initiative, Israel may welcome a Saudi embassy in Jerusalem.
      I think things can change once the Arab states realise the advantages of doing so. But they really need to drop the act: it's counter-productive.

      Anon, thank you so much for your great comment :D.

      Cheers

      Delete
  2. There is plenty of sand in Arab lands for the proverbial burying their heads.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Rummy :D!

      Indeed. But it can't last forever so I wonder what will have to happen to make them take their heads off the sand.

      My friend, thank you so much for your comment :D.

      Cheers

      Delete
  3. The west wants the middle east at war so they won't encourage any of the sides to normalise ties.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Jake :D!

      It does seem to be the case, doesn't it?
      Thank you for your comment :D:

      Cheers

      Delete
  4. Lass, without wishing to sound paranoid I'd say there's something more perverse going on in the region. It's just not possible to assume that Arabs are this stupid cause they're not as proven by the voices that now call for end of this bloody charade. What are our western friends looking for there exactly? The explanations given are too simplistic, too idiotic to stick. Once Arabs realise what they can achieve they will dramatically change their position. Keep up the good work, lass!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Joe :D!

      Something more perverse, like what, my friend?
      I agree, Arabs are not stupid at all (in fact, their history show us otherwise) but I think the West has paradoxically under and over estimated them leading them to see look at us all as inferior beings deserving of what comes our way.

      "Once Arabs realise what they can achieve they will dramatically change their position."

      Perhaps they need assistance from someone who respect them, truly respects them.

      Thank you, darling, for your comment and support :D. Don't be a stranger now!

      Cheers :D

      Delete
  5. Arabs insist on the Arab Peace Initiative as a basis for normalisation of ties with Israel but it's all bullshit cause they know that initiative is suicidal, so I don't believe Arabs are honest players here. But they are not the only ones to blame cuz the US has no interest at all to see the middle east in peace, so they apply the 'divide to conquer' type of tactic when they think of the region.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Mike :D!

      The Arab initiative for peace is a distraction, it's for internal consumption. It is a way of entertaining the masses till they decide what to do next, or they are starting to find a way of justifying a dramatic change towards Israel (I wouldn't be surprised if they'd throw the Palestinians under the bus one of these days and then explain that political expedience demands a change in diplomatic relations, whom knows?).

      The US would do well to change their failed policy too.

      Mike, thank you so much for your comment :D.

      Cheers

      Delete
  6. Throwing the PLA under the bus is a good point. This is why Iran has begun to exert its influence within the PLA. What could be a good strategy is to take up the peace offer and see how it plays out. This would certainly place the initiators in a predicament and the Iranians will also have their own reaction to it. Let us not forget Russian reaction and the new players such as Turkey and the Kurds.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Kmaster :D!

      Indeed. The Arab Peace Initiative as it presents itself is unacceptable to Israel, but instead of re-initiating peace talks with the PA, it would be a good strategy to start peace talks with the Arab League: what do you think? Now that would be quite a pivot and, as you said, it "would place the initiators in a predicament".

      "Let us not forget Russian reaction and the new players such as Turkey and the Kurds."

      Yes, we have to take their position and interests into account as well. Good point.

      Kmaster, thank you a million times for your fresh perspective :D. Always a pleasure.

      Cheers

      Delete
  7. Roger that . The Arab League is a good start. We have ti bear in mind that they themselves will face a challenge. I am always concerned about the heavy back door diplomacy activity and perhaps we will also have to explore this possibility.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kmaster, I agree: even if the Arab League wants to go in a different direction there will be other forces, i.e the establishment, who will want to force them to remain in the same path. But a challenge is not an impossibility, right? What matters is to start doing something different to change the status quo.

      "I am always concerned about the heavy back door diplomacy activity and perhaps we will also have to explore this possibility."

      For sure.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Dissecting Society welcomes all sorts of comments, as we are strong advocates of freedom of speech; however, we reserve the right to delete Troll Activity; libellous and offensive comments (e.g. racist and anti-Semitic) plus those with excessive foul language. This blog does not view vulgarity as being protected by the right to free speech. Cheers