
Super City: a large metropolitan area comprised of, at least, 8 million people, undergoing rapid growth in population and urbanisation.
A priori, this sounds a rather interesting concept, but in truth it is one that masks a series of social and economic problems; that in the long run, may reveal to be catastrophic.
The first impact of mass migrations (to the megalopolis) is chaotic: usually these cities are not prepared to receive such a huge number of people, which could result in illicit “urbanisation” (ex: the “favelas” in the São Paulo metropolitan area, and the “barracas” in the Lisbon metropolitan area, during the 80’s), thus causing environmental pollution (due to poor, or no, sewage system); high rates of unemployment (since there may not be enough jobs for all) that will lead to low human development, which in turn will result in high crime rates.
If we think of it from the city management point of view, more chaos could be generated; for imagine that most of the population is fully employed (in a perfect scenario), thus having favourable living standards: if they all own cars and the majority drives to work (due to lack of proper public transportation planning) the super city will suffer from consistent congested traffic; air pollution; it will have to invest a lot in the maintenance of the heavily used pavements; focus in the potholes and other asphalt defects.
Super cities may help decrease life expectancy.

("Barraca" of Lisbon, in the 80's)
Now think with me...even if a genius comes up with a way to surpass these disturbing issues and actually organise the super city in a way that its environmental and common health impacts are favourable to us all (thus rendering the megapolis huge economic and political power); there are nations that will never be able to form super cities (ex: Portugal, Israel, Belgian, Luxemburg, the Netherlands etc) so, where would they stand in the new political scenario?
Moreover: would the present alliances (EU, Arab League, Asian-Pacific Economic Cooperation, AU etc) end, so that new ones (based on the super cities) would emerge?
There is the danger that these powerful megalopolis may, in the long run, aim at replacing state nations (due to their organisational autonomy), which could lead to civil wars all over again.
However global unification (despite its imperativeness to development) can never substitute state nations because of one crucial factor: cultural identity.
The culture of any nation, and its traditions, is part of a people’s identity, which is what glues them together, to fight for the national common good and interests.
Small cities are easier to administrate (in every sense), they are environmentally healthier and generate sane individuals.
Super cities promote estrangement, lack of sense of community, loneliness, depression, suicide.
Global unification should foment cultural exchange (which incites understanding, mutual respect and tolerance) and not acculturation.
Nations states are more than monetary fortitude and political strength; they are the land, the people, their history, identity, values and sense of belonging.





